REST vs GraphQL

REST (Representational State Transfer)

What It Is:

A stateless architecture style for designing networked applications using standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, DELETE.

Key Characteristics:

• URL endpoints represent resources.
• Communication via HTTP methods.
• Data format is typically JSON but can also include XML, plain text, etc.
• Stateless interactions; each request contains all the necessary information.

Advantages:

1. Simple and widely adopted.
2. Leverages HTTP caching to improve performance.
3. Language-agnostic and framework-agnostic.
4. Suitable for simple CRUD operations.

Disadvantages:

1. Over-fetching and under-fetching issues (clients often receive more or less data than needed).
2. Changes in API versions require maintaining multiple endpoints.
3. Limited flexibility in requesting specific data.

When to Use REST:

• Applications with well-defined and stable resources (e.g., blog posts, user profiles).
• Systems requiring simple CRUD operations.
• When caching is critical for performance.

---

GraphQL

What It Is:

A query language and runtime for APIs that allows clients to request exactly the data they need.

Key Characteristics:

• Single endpoint (e.g., /graphql).
• Clients define the structure of the response.
• Strongly typed schema (SDL - Schema Definition Language).
• Supports queries, mutations, and subscriptions.

Advantages:

1. No over-fetching or under-fetching; clients get precisely what they request.
2. Flexible and efficient for evolving APIs.
3. Built-in introspection and documentation.
4. Reduces the number of requests for complex data structures.
5. Supports real-time updates via subscriptions.

Disadvantages:

1. Complexity in setup and maintenance.
2. Overhead of query parsing and execution.
3. Challenges with caching due to dynamic queries.

When to Use GraphQL:

• Applications with complex data relationships (e.g., social media, dashboards).
• When front-end developers need more control over the API.
• Rapidly evolving systems with frequent changes to data requirements.
• Scenarios requiring real-time data updates.

---

Comparison Table

Feature	REST	GraphQL
Endpoint Structure	Multiple endpoints for resources	Single endpoint (/graphql)
Data Fetching	Over-fetching or under-fetching possible	Fetch exactly what you need
Real-Time Updates	Requires custom implementation (e.g., WebSockets)	Supported via subscriptions
Caching	Simple with HTTP caching	More complex due to dynamic queries
Tooling	Mature tools like Postman	GraphQL playground, Apollo DevTools
Ease of Setup	Easier and faster	More complex, requires schema design
Use Cases	CRUD-heavy applications	Complex, flexible, or real-time applications

---

When to Use Which?

Use REST When:

• Your API involves simple CRUD operations.
• Performance can be improved with HTTP caching.
• The system is already using REST and doesn't require advanced features.
• You need quick implementation with minimal complexity.

Use GraphQL When:

• You want precise control over the data fetched.
• Your application has complex or nested data relationships.
• There are frequent changes to the front-end's data requirements.
• Real-time features like live updates or subscriptions are needed.

---

REST and GraphQL in the Same System

It is possible to use both REST and GraphQL in the same system:

• Use REST for public APIs where simplicity and performance matter.
• Use GraphQL for internal APIs or client-facing systems requiring flexibility and customizability.

---

This cheatsheet provides a comprehensive overview to help you decide between REST and GraphQL for your frontend system design. Let me know if you need additional details or examples!